Authors may also choose to submit their manuscript to a journal outside of the Nature Portfolio. 0, :3.0 | :25.0IF6.0NCBI, 310 The submission remains at this status until you select "Build PDF for Approval". You have completed the submission and approval steps, and the article has been submitted to the journal. [CDATA[> Acknowledgements should be brief, and should not include thanks to anonymous Reviewersand Editors, or effusive comments. Authors must justify the use of a particular test and explain whether their data conform to the assumptions of the tests. Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores ( ScholarOne ), reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. In addition, Reviewers can access the manuscript online, which speeds up the review process. Commun. Three errors are particularly common: Multiple comparisons: When making multiple statistical comparisons on a single data set, authors should explain how they adjusted the alpha level to avoid an inflated Type I error rate, or they should select statistical tests appropriate for multiple groups (such as ANOVA rather than a series of t-tests). The Editors also reserve the right to reject a paper even after it has been accepted if it becomes apparent that there are serious problems with the scientific content or with violations of our publishing policies. This checklist is not sent to the Reviewers but must be received by the Editors before the paper can be sent for peer-review. ), direct structural analysis by NMR spectroscopic methods may not be possible. When appropriate, figures should include error bars. When possible, we prefer to use original digital figures to ensure the highest-quality reproduction in the journal. NPJ PRECIS ONCOL . Using this system, authors can upload manuscript files (text, figures, videos) directly to our office and check on the status of their manuscripts during the review process. The corresponding author should be familiar with the journals Editorial policies and is solely responsible for communicating with the journal and managing communication between coauthors. When selecting Reviewers, we seek to avoid conflicts of interest and close associates of the authors. Based on the Reviewer recommendations, you can use the action buttons to make a decision. We can accept LaTeX files at the acceptance stage, but before then please supply compiled PDFs. The process involves both the journal editors and independent expert reviewers, who evaluate . If you have figures or tables prepared, include them with your appeal letter. npj Precision Oncology (npj Precis. This status will remain until an Editor takes an action in the system to change the status, usually inviting reviewers. The npj Series journal Editors reserve the right to make the final decision about matters of style and the size of figures. I do understand that you cannot have exact answer. Full disclosure: Editage Insights is a product of Editage, a global provider of world-class scientific communication solutions. Any data necessary to evaluate the claims of the paper that are not available via a public depository should be provided as Supplementary Information. Resubmit for Review: This will require the Author to make major changes and another round of review will need to take place..
How Do Airbenders Get Their Tattoos, Byrd Property Management, Articles W