DENR Administrative Order No. The Solicitor General sought the annulment of the decision on the ground that the land registration court had no jurisdiction over the case, specifically, over the Lot which was not alienable and disposable. 26 Blacks Law Dictionary, 6th Ed., 1990. And courts are without jurisdiction to adjudicate lands within the forest zone. MYRNA TORRES bought the property from Angelina Reynoso on 16 October 1982 through a Deed of Sale (Exhibit "G"). ", In fine, one claiming "private rights" must prove that he has complied with C.A. This paper examines the problems and issues in the granting and in the consequent acceptance of the certificate of stewardship contract (CSC). Petitioners argue that the remedy of annulment of judgment is no longer available because it is barred by the principle of res judicata. It focuses on the insights What is a condominium? 11 Republic vs. Sayo, 191 SCRA 71 (1990). WebCertificate of Stewardship is awarded to individuals or families actually occupying or tilling portions of forest lands pursuant to LOI 1260 for a period of 25 years renewable for 23 "Sec. >> Likewise, in a letter38 dated November 11, 1991, the Deputy Land Inspector, DENR, Region IV, Community Environment and Natural Resources Office, Antipolo, Rizal, similarly confirmed that the Lot is within the MWR. Subsequently, then President Aquino issued Proclamation No. Considering that the people have little if no direct interest in the protection of the Matangtubig structures they couldnt care less even if it would be destroyed. All income/proceeds derived from the land shall accrue to the CS holder. 39-41; Rollo, pp. The Court in Sta. 573 classified as inalienable. Section 4 (a) of RA No. Notes: stewardship is not a ownership, so they have no rights to transfer or sell the land. In the case of Municipality of Santiago vs. Court of Appeals, 120 SCRA 734, 1983 "private rights" is proof of acquisition through (sic) among means of acquisition of public lands. Hence, the court again issued an order submitting the case for decision based on the evidence of the petitioners.